Monday June 8
|
|
|
|
08.30 |
|
Opening remarks |
|
|
M. Amor, N. Cheshire, E. Ducasse, M. Lachat, N. Mangialardi, P. Schneider, I. Van Herzeele |
|
|
|
08.35 |
|
BTK strategies and best options |
|
|
Moderators: R. Ferraresi, A. Sauguet, E. Ducasse |
|
|
|
|
|
State of the art of BTK-CLI treatment |
|
|
08.35 |
|
Arterial status, angiosome, arterial calcifications, is it possible to plan treatment at BTK level? M. Gargiulo 
|
|
|
08.43 |
|
Big vessel versus small vessel disease: what is the true cause of critical limb ischemia? R. Ferraresi 
|
|
|
08.51 |
|
BTK long lesions: devices and optimaltreatment, R. Ferraresi 
|
|
|
08.59 |
|
Insight about ultrasound in planing, access and control of BTK angioplasty, E. Puras Mallagray 
|
|
|
09.07 |
|
BTK bifurcations: best treatment, F. Airoldi 
|
|
|
09.15 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
State of the art: |
|
|
09.20 |
|
Drug eluting stent in BTK disease, K. Deloose 
|
|
|
09.28 |
|
Bare metal stent in BTK disease, E. Ducasse 
|
|
|
09.36 |
|
Drug eluting balloon in BTK disease, K. Deloose 
|
|
|
09.44 |
|
Distal bypass in BTK disease, P. Schneider 
|
|
|
09.56 |
|
Discussion, M. Di Primio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Coffee break in the exhibition hall  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tips & tricks & complications |
|
|
10.30 |
|
Challenging BTK case, E. Ducasse 
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
When coronary devices could help? A. Sauguet 
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
Below-the-ankle angioplasty and stenting for CLI, J. Brunet 
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
Extreme distal revascularization with conventional and alternative techniques, M. Di Primio |
|
|
11.10 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
11.20 |
|
Thoracic pathology |
|
|
Moderators: S. Ronchey, F. Veith, A. Bray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How I deal with the aortic arch: from planning to follow-up |
|
|
11.20 |
|
My experience in ascending aorta TEVAR, I. Loftus 
|
|
|
11.28 |
|
Open surgery conventional: discrepancy in results (lights and shadow), D. Pacini 
|
|
|
11.36 |
|
Ascending aorta: is the endovascular approach realistic? T. Kölbel 
|
|
|
11.44 |
|
Off the shelf solution: selection based on planning, N. Mangialardi 
|
|
|
11.52 |
|
My planing for arch Chimney, J. Brunkwall 
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
Endoleak after arch Chimney, R. Kolvenbach 
|
|
|
12.08 |
|
Hybrid repair: technique for total debranching, P. Bergeron 
|
|
|
12.16 |
|
Stroke rate and mortality in arch procedures, M. Lachat 
|
|
|
12.24 |
|
Endovascular arch repair following ascending aorta open surgery, T. Kölbel 
|
|
|
12.32 |
|
Complications of supraaortic debranching, S. Ronchey 
|
|
|
12.40 |
|
Demonstration (crazy arch case), T. Larzon 
|
|
|
12.48 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
Buffet lunch served on the rooftop, coffee served in the exhibition hall 
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
Thoracic pathology |
|
|
Moderators: J. Busquet, F. Veith, M. Lachat, N. Mangialardi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dissection |
|
|
14.00 |
|
We do treat all - and why, N. Cheshire |
|
|
14.08 |
|
I do treat when appropriate, J. Steuer 
|
|
|
14.16 |
|
The false channel occlusion technique, T. Kölbel 
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
TEVAR for chronic dissection, I. Loftus 
|
|
|
14.32 |
|
News from imaging will change our attitude, L. Maene 
|
|
|
14.40 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descending aorta |
|
|
14.50 |
|
TEVAR European guidelines, V. Riambau |
|
|
14.58 |
|
How I fix endoleak in TEVAR, P. Kasprzak |
|
|
15.06 |
|
Clampless sutured anastomosis technique, Z. Rancic 
|
|
|
15.14 |
|
Long-term results for TEVAR after BAI, R. Vallabhaneni |
|
|
15.22 |
|
Access vessels challenges and best access route, F. Setacci 
|
|
|
15.30 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
15.45 |
|
Highly complex lesions in femo/pop. What do I learn from my daily practice ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.45 |
|
Clinical case review, J. Brunet 
|
|
|
15.57 |
|
Clinical case review, M. Amor |
|
|
16.09 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.15 |
|
Coffee break in the exhibition hall  |
|
|
|
|
|
16.45 |
|
Femoropopliteal disease - Part 1 |
|
|
Moderators: Y. Gouëffic, K. Deloose, P. Schneider, C. Setacci |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy |
|
|
16.45 |
|
Anti-platelet therapy: who needs it and what to prescribe, K. Deloose 
|
|
|
16.53 |
|
Popliteal artery aneurysm - What is the best mode of treatment? T. Schmitz Rixen 
|
|
|
17.01 |
|
Radial access for femoropopliteal lesions: tips and tricks, R. Coscas 
|
|
|
17.09 |
|
Closure devices: treatment of complications, J. Van Den Berg 
|
|
|
17.18 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASC A/B femoropopliteal lesions |
|
|
17.20 |
|
Is connected stent the good option for TASC A/B SFA lesions? E. Ducasse 
|
|
|
17.30 |
|
Discussion |
|
|
|
|
Debate. TASC A/B femoropopliteal lesions treatment |
|
|
|
|
17.35 Stent should be the first line treatment, J-P. de Vries |
|
|
|
|
17.43 Two-year results of a low-dose drug-coated balloon for revascularization of the femoropopliteal artery (ILLUMENATE FIH Trial), Y. Gouëffic 
|
|
|
|
|
17.51 DES should be the first line treatment, J. Van Den Berg 
|
|
|
|
|
17.59 Discussion |
|
|
18.05 |
|
Are current stents ready for the « surgical landing-zones »? L. Maene 
|
|
|
18.13 |
|
Lecture from China: Selective stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for renovascular hypertension caused by Takayasu Arteritis: two-year results, X. Jiang 
|
|
|
18.21 |
|
End of the sessions |